One of the most common queries we
get from structural engineers is how steel screw piles are designed to deal
with corrosion (rusting). While there
are numerous ways of dealing with corrosion, Piletech typically recommend
dealing with corrosion by the most powerful tool at our disposal: DESIGN.
There are three typical methods
used for corrosion protection:
1. Coating systems (including galvanising)
2. Cathodic protection
3. Sacrificial section area
In our experience galvanising and
other coating systems are problematic as they get compromised and scratched off
the pile during the installation process, or before they’re even being unloaded
from the truck. They also have a limited
design life. Even worse, galvanising and coating systems can also promote localised corrosion intensity
if a crack in the coatings forms. We’ve also seen systems such as Denso tape or
HDPE sleeves – these options not only increase costs but increase programme and
can cause H&S issues during installation.
Cathodic protection involves
setting up an electrochemical cell with the pile becoming the cathode and a
sacrificial anode. This method of preventing corrosion is troublesome as the
anode has a limited lifecycle and as such this method presents the need to
continuously maintain the system over the design lifecycle of the piles. Initial
setup costs for cathodic protection is also comparatively high.
Piletech now believe the best way
to ensure quality assurance of the corrosion protection methodology is to
simply allow sacrificial wall thickness to achieve the required design life for
the piles. It’s also cheaper, quicker,
requires less QA, safer…. And it’s a lot easier – done with the flick of a pen
before mobilising to site.
To calculate the required section
thickness of the shaft and the helix you must first determine the design life
of the piles, look at the surface area affected, and then estimate the rate at
which the section will corrode. The design life is generally specified by the
Structural Engineer; for permanent structures this is typically 50 or 100 years
depending on the importance level of the structure.
With regard to the surface area
considered, Piletech allow for corrosion to the outside face of the CHS shaft
of a screw pile and to both faces of the pile helices. We don’t typically
include for internal corrosion because the pile is concrete filled with a base
cap to prevent soil entering into the pile thus eliminating any free oxygen
required to cause corrosion.
The corrosion rate is either
determined by soil testing on site, or it can be referenced in either
AS2159:2009, HERA Design and Construct Bulletin No. 46 (reissued as Bulletin
No. 62), NZS3404:2009 and/or The New Zealand Building Code.
The New Zealand Building Code
verification method B1/VM4 states that the amount of section area deducted
needs to take account of the aggressiveness of the soil and that further guidance
can be found in AS2159:2009 Section
6.5 or the HERA Design and Construction
Bulletin No. 46.
AS2159:2009 calls for a uniform corrosion allowance (mm/yr) which
is dependent on the exposure classification. The exposure conditions depends on
the PH, Chloride levels, Resistivity of the soil and the soil condition (high
or low permeability soil). Using AS2159:2009 the steel sections of our piles
typically fall into the non-aggressive (less than 0.01mm/year) or mild (0.01 - 0.02mm/year)
category.
HERA Design and Construct Bulletin No. 46 is specifically written
relating to corrosion of steel sections in the ground and in water. Prior to this report being issued, the go-to
standard for corrosion rates was from a Steel Construction Institute (SCI)
publication which outlined a rate of 0.015mm/year, regardless of soil
conditions. Thus the HERA report set out
to test this rate in relation to the following variables:
- A natural soil pH ranging from 2.3-9.5
- Soil Resistivity ranging between 300-50,000 Ohm’s
- Soil N Values between 4-40
- the majority of all the sites included intersecting water tables with both saline and fresh water with some exhibiting groundwater flow.
The key findings are outlined below:
1. The highest corrosion rates
were found in permeable soils within 2.5 metres of the surface and which were
at or above the water table. Even at the upper level the corrosion rate was below
the 0.015mm/year outlined above.
2. Both mean and maximum
corrosion rates decrease with time after installation of the pile.
3. There is no statistical
significance found between the corrosion rate and any of the following parameters:
soil type and permeability, N Value of the soil, pH of soil (there was a slight
increase in corrosion rate below pH of 4), soil resistivity and nature of ground
water.
4. The corrosion rate was similar
on all faces of the steel pile.
5. The type of steel has no
influence.
These conclusions indicate that the soil conditions have very little
effect on the corrosion rate of the pile, and that using a 0.015mm/year
corrosion rate is not only applicable, but conservative.
As a final reference, NZS3404:2009 - the structural steel
code - has design corrosion rates depending on the location (exposed, water and
soil), the type of fill encountered (controlled, uncontrolled) and the level of
the water table. The two cases most relevant to Piletech screw piles are buried
in fill below the permanent water table and the buried in controlled fill above
the permanent water table both these cases have a design corrosion rate of
0.015 mm /year. Which is in line with
the other code requirements, as outlined above.
Thus, Piletech – unless directed otherwise – typically utilise a
conservative corrosion rate of 0.03 mm / year for the outside of the pile
shaft and 0.015 mm / year for both sides of the pile helix. It’s also cheaper, quicker, with no QA
hassles before our site teams mobilise to site.
EXAMPLE:
Typical design values for
corrosion over design life for Piletech screw piles
50 year design
life (Shaft) = .03 x 50 = 1.5mm
100 year
design life (Shaft) = .03 x 100 = 3mm
50 year design
life (Helix) = .015 x 2 x 50 = 1.5mm
100 year
design life (Helix) = .015 x 2 x 100 = 3mm
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteWhen Only the Best screw will Do.When and where to save on piling costs with screw piles.
ReplyDeleteWe provide services of Basement Waterproofing,Concrete Repair,Footings,Subsidence,Basement Underpin Articles,Basement Walls,Retaining Walls,Shoring,Spray Concrete,Underpinning,Grout Injection,House Underpinning(Sydney),Underpinning Services,Foundation Repairs,Basement Garages,House Restumping and Ventilation Sub-Floor
blade pile
Great article
ReplyDeleteDon Doleshal
Enjoyed this read. Visit Pilecapinc-Pile Repair Systems and Pile Cleaning Services
ReplyDeleteNice, i fine informative content here. thanks for sharing
ReplyDeleteScrew Pile Installation
Nice, i fine informative content here. thanks for sharing
ReplyDeleteScrew Pile Installation
Nice, i fine informative content here. thanks for sharing
ReplyDeleteWow what a great blog, i really enjoyed reading this, good luck in your work. Concrete Pile Repair Sleeve
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing this piece! It is very helpful and informative. Would love to see more updates from you.
ReplyDeleteelcometer 456
I think this is an informative post and it is very useful and knowledgeable. therefore, I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. remove barnacles from pilings
ReplyDeleteVery informative and impressive post you have written, this is quite interesting. Keep sharing such valuable information.
ReplyDeleteConcrete pile repair sleeve
Very informative and impressive post you have written, this is quite interesting. Keep sharing such valuable information.
ReplyDeletePile coat Systems
Nice Post! thanks for sharing it
ReplyDeletevery informative Timber Pile Repair System
Thanks for sharing informative article
ReplyDeleteH-Pile Repair System
Thanks for the blog loaded with so many information. Stopping by your blog helped me to get what I was looking for. Badger Box
ReplyDeleteFoundation Repair Company Corpus Christi I have read all the comments and suggestions posted by the visitors for this article are very fine,We will wait for your next article so only.Thanks!
ReplyDeleteTX Foundation Repair Company I have read all the comments and suggestions posted by the visitors for this article are very fine,We will wait for your next article so only.Thanks!
ReplyDeleteFrisco TX Foundation Repair Company I have read all the comments and suggestions posted by the visitors for this article are very fine,We will wait for your next article so only.Thanks!
ReplyDeleteThank you for some other informative website. The place else may just I get that kind of information written in such a perfect method? I have a venture that I am simply now running on, and I’ve been at the glance out for such info. Hydraulic Trench Shores
ReplyDeleteThis is very educational content and written well for a change. It's nice to see that some people still understand how to write a quality post.! Build-a-Box
ReplyDelete